The Republican party needs more adult voices like this.
27 September 2009
26 September 2009
24 September 2009
Oh no . . .
Update: It was pointed out to me that it doesn't look like he threw the frog in the water . . . I'm not sure what he was trying to do.
23 September 2009
New Flash: Fox is not a legitimate news source
Not a huge fan of CNN either, but they're at least not blatant hacks.
22 September 2009
I knew there was a reason I voted for Obama
18 September 2009
This is awesome!
Two million out-of-copyright books that have been scanned by Google could come back into limited printed form after the search giant signed a deal with On Demand Books, the company that makes the Espresso Book Machine - a custom book printer able to produce a bound one-off 300-page paperback, with a full-colour cover, in about five minutes.
Poor whites and the race factor
I concluded that in a highly hierarchical society such as the Old South, those who are near/at the bottom of the totem pole can be expected to fight hard for any status that they have. When all of a sudden the stratus below you starts organizing effectively for more civil rights and equality (leaving you behind), you can't be expected to be happy about your impending loss of relative status. This is obviously not the entire explanation, but I think it is partially what was/is going on.
Anyway, here's an article I stumbled upon that articulates very well what I concluded (wow that sounds really snotty).
The Root: The Birthers and Jim Crow 2.0
Update: Another article that talks about the issue well as far as I can tell.
racismview.com : Irish-Americans, Racism and the Pursuit of Whiteness
17 September 2009
15 September 2009
This concerns me . . .
Israel's army is changing. Once proudly secular, its combat units are now filling with those who believe Israel's wars are "God's wars".
Military rabbis are becoming more powerful. Trained in warfare as well as religion, new army regulations mean they are now part of a military elite.
. . .
In previous wars rabbis had to stay far from the front, he says. In Gaza, they were ordered to accompany the fighters.
"Our job was to boost the fighting spirit of the soldiers. The eternal Jewish spirit from Bible times to the coming of the Messiah."
None of this is necessarily surprising or unprecedented, but I still don't like it. A country who thinks it has God on its side regardless of the atrocities it commits cannot be a dependable ally to the United States or any other country. We already have militant Islamic fanatics to deal with. We don't need a more modern (nuclear-armed) and efficient state to engage in the same kind of fanaticism.
In short, this is obviously a terrible development to the extent that peace in the Middle East is desirable. There is no hope as long as either/both sides think God gave them the land of Palestine, and that's just that.
13 September 2009
Delong: Tire tariffs stupid
Why oh why can't we have better Democratic presidents? . . .
Let's see... 250 million cars in America... need 4 tires per car... need new tires every 2.5 years. 400 million tires a year... $1.4 billion dollars a year... 10,000 worker jobs saved... $140,000 dollars per worker-job per year.
Looks like we could (a) let the Chinese sell us tires, (b) tax each tire by $2.50, (c) pay each tire worker who loses his or her job $100K a year, and we come out ahead: American households have more money to spend on other things, China has more jobs to help what is still a very poor country grow, and tire workers have higher incomes and more leisure as well.
But, you say, it would be stupid to impose a $2 a tire tax and use the money to pay each laid-off tire worker $100K a year.
That's the point: when the policy you are adopting is worse for everybody than a policy you agree is stupid, the policy you are adopting is best characterized as really stupid.
12 September 2009
This is ridiculous . . .
07 September 2009
05 September 2009
NY Times on the Speech Controversy
It's a good article. First, some mind-bogglingly misinformed comments:
“The thing that concerned me most about it was it seemed like a direct channel from the president of the United States into the classroom, to my child,” said Brett Curtis, an engineer from Pearland, Tex., who said he would keep his three children home.
“I don’t want our schools turned over to some socialist movement.”
Then a good reminder that both parties are political in the cynical sense of the word:
The first President George Bush, a Republican, made a similar nationally broadcast speech from a Washington high school in 1991, urging students to study hard, avoid drugs and to ignore peers “who think it’s not cool to be smart.” Democrats in Congress accused him of using taxpayer money — $27,000 to produce the broadcast — for “paid political advertising.”
And finally, some people who make sense:
Some Houston parents, however, said telling children they should not hear out the president of the United States, even if their parents dislike his policies, sends the wrong message — that one should not listen to someone with whom you disagree.
“It’s difficult for me to understand how listening to the president, the commander in chief, the chief citizen of this country, is damaging to the youth of today,” said Phyllis Griffin Epps, an analyst for the city who has two children in public school.
Orwellian?
Hardly. Having looked at it after being asked about it by various people, I don't see a big problem. The democratically elected leader of the country is going to give a nice speech about staying in school, educational achievement, setting goals, etc. I don't see anything insidious at work here, but I also don't give any credence to the hypothesis that President Obama is another Mao waiting to happen.
Here are some sources that may be interesting (hosted on my Skydrive).
The original lesson plans:
Pre-K to 6-year-olds
7 to 12-year-olds
The new, post-outrage lesson plans:
Pre-K to 6-year-olds
7 to 12-year-olds
Really?
And the lack of this would be who's fault?
Update: A good discussion of this
Yay for Libertarian Paternalism
Most of the following changes will take effect immediately because of rule changes made by the Treasury Department.
Auto enrollment in retirement plans: To make it easier for smaller and medium-sized employers to automatically enroll workers into retirement plans, the administration will clear up some bureaucratic paper-work hurdles for employers to offer that option. Employees could still choose to opt out of the retirement plans.
Saving tax refunds: To make it easier for those owed tax refunds to save, the IRS will allow tax filers in 2010 to recoup their refund by issuing U.S. savings bonds.
Sick days and vacation time become 401(k) money: To make it easier for workers to rack up savings, the White House will make it easier for employers to convert (or allow workers to convert) unused vacation and sick leave pay into 401(k) contributions.
Richard Thaler's hands are obviously all over this.
