23 December 2009

China wrecked the Copenhagen deal

Mark Lynas, guardian.co.uk: How do I know China wrecked the Copenhagen deal? I was in the room
China's strategy was simple: block the open negotiations for two weeks, and then ensure that the closed-door deal made it look as if the west had failed the world's poor once again. And sure enough, the aid agencies, civil society movements and environmental groups all took the bait.
Full Post

15 December 2009

Maybe there is an issue here

NY Times: Glenn Beck’s Gold Deal Raising Questions at Fox

[I]t would be “problematic without question” if Mr. Beck did have a position as a paid spokesman for a product.
Full Post

Obama's Nobel Remarks



Text

Commentary from David Brooks
Full Post

11 December 2009

Intriguing idea

So I was just saying to a friend the other day that the idea of someone heavily invested in gold could be a little unnerving because they gain an interest in societal instability. I kinda doubt Stewart's causal story - I suspect that Beck is paranoid, so he buys gold, not that he's paranoid because he's invested in gold and wants to increase demand for it. But, as they say, "isn't it interesting?"

Full Post

07 December 2009

Rent-seeking monopolist afraid of losing control



People like this drive me nuts. I understand why he's worried, but his high-horse attitude is ridiculous. He wants to keep extracting monopoly profits from his books and is apparently willing to retard technological advance to make sure he can do that. I'm prejudiced towards the opinion that most authors worth reading would have written regardless of copyright laws. Dan Brown (assuming generously for a moment that he is worth reading) may not have become a millionaire, but it is far from obvious that he would have made nothing. But leaving that aside, boycotting technology won't make it go away. It will only make you adapt badly to it.
Full Post

06 December 2009

The Ascent of Man



This is a really great series from Jacob Bronowski that I ran across the other day. It's basically a condensed cultural and scientific history of mankind, from the earliest evidence we have to the modern day. It's really interesting stuff, and great especially when you're doing something and want something going sort of in the background (otherwise it's probably too long to have time to sit through).
Full Post

No comment



Full Post

This is all I will post on the matter. Honest.

Andrew Sullivan, quoting John Mark Reynolds

I take Sarah Palin seriously, I take America seriously, I take her ideas seriously. Do you NOT take her seriously? Should I have picked up a four hundred page book and assumed it was error riddled fluff, but that is o.k. because it was just for the folks? How condescending is that? People are not well served when it is assumed any old dumb thing will do for us if it strokes our egos and tells us what we believe. That is the real snobbery.

My grandfather never got to go to high school, but he wanted his political heroes (men like Bob Taft and Eisenhower) to give it to him straight and to get it right. He wanted men of substance. He read his paper and his King James Bible every day and he would have had no time for books like “Going Rogue” that take his hard earned money, but don’t bother with the most basic fact check . . .
Full Post