13 April 2009

Megan McArdle on health care costs

There are some really good points here.
Practically, we have to pay healthcare workers a lot because we have to pay everyone a lot; in a rich country, wages for healthcare workers are high. And measuring healthcare productivity is really insanely difficult, which makes it very hard to figure out what's worth spending money on. As long as Americans don't want to sacrifice access to procedures--and they don't--there's just not much room for decreasing costs.

[. . .]

That doesn't bother me that much. The mindless trend extrapolation about how much we'll spend on health care in the future elides the point that we'll be much richer in the future; why shouldn't we spend all that extra income on healthcare?[. . .] When I look around at our incredibly bountiful economy, I don't see any obvious lack that we're creating by spending ever more of our income on leading longer, healthier lives.
Full Post

Krugman: We need a credible Republican Party

NY Times: Tea Parties Forever
So what’s the implication of the fact that Republicans are refusing to grow up, the fact that they are still behaving the same way they did when history seemed to be on their side? I’d say that it’s good for Democrats, at least in the short run — but it’s bad for the country.
Full Post

09 April 2009

Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments

A good review/overview of Smith's relatively unknown work. The author gives a good introduction to Smith's general premise of the book. I highly recommend it to everyone. It's a long read, but one that had me constantly looking for a pencil to take notes (which made it an even longer read). Go get it now.

The Sydney Morning Herald: Cut-throat behaviour makes empathy flow
Full Post

06 April 2009

Epic Missile Fail!

NY Times: North Korean Missile Launch was a Failure, Experts Say
“It’s got to be embarrassing,” said Geoffrey E. Forden, a missile expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “I can imagine heads flying if the ‘Dear Leader’ finds out the satellite didn’t fly into orbit[.]”
Joseph Cirincione: North Korean launch not cause for panic
Full Post

Obama in Turkey

Financial Times: Obama makes Mideast peace pledge
The Economist: Reaching Out to Turkey
NY Times: In Turkey, Obama Says U.S. ‘Never’ at War With Islam


Full video on CSPAN
This is worth watching.
Full Post

05 April 2009

How to fix the economy

The Onion: The Only Way Out Of This Crisis Is To Build More Houses
Full Post

"How to Improve the Geithner Plan"

here

This seeems very sensible.
Readers Digest version:
First, to fix the price discovery problem we should ask the bank managers to lend their own money, alongside the FDIC and the Fed, for the acquisition of the toxic assets.
Second, to reduce the risk for the public, the banks should put their earnings as collateral for the loans. Also, compensations for employees in excess of a certain threshold should be put as collateral.

Hat Tip: Mark Thoma
Full Post

This is kinda warped . . .

NY Times: Chinese Hunger for Sons Fuels Boys’ Abductions
Full Post

This seems intuitively to be a bad idea

But what do I know . . .
msnbc.com: Relaxed accounting rules will help banks
Full Post

William K Black on Bill Moyers

Watch this here.
Full Post

02 April 2009

01 April 2009

Cool website with free Kindle content (downloadable from the Kindle)

feedbooks.com
Full Post

Joe Stiglitz is against the Geithner Plan

here

Hat Tip: Greg Mankiw
Full Post

Cool

New Scientist: Yeast-powered fuel cell feeds on human blood
Yeast cells feeding on the glucose in human blood might one day power implants such as pacemakers. A living source of power that is able to regenerate itself would eliminate the need for regular operations to replace batteries.
Full Post

Glenn Beck on The Colbert Report



The latest of a series:
Part I
Part II
Part III
Full Post

I guesss this should not surprise me, but wow

Daily Kos: Fox accuses White House of trying to impose Sharia law in US


The Right has come unglued. There is no other explanation.
Full Post

This puts things in context . . .

Full Post

Chinese carrier destroying missile

This is a bit unnerving . . .
Full Post

Verdict from Israeli Army Inquiry into war crimes: Not Guilty!

NY Times: Israel Ends Inquiry Into Abuse in Gaza
Full Post

Has the Right come completely unglued?

This just in from Red State, a popular right-wing blog (I don't think "conservative" can really be applied to the Republicans these days). Beck syndrome is apparently rampant.
The issue:
Spokane County became the launch pad last July for the nation’s strictest ban on dishwasher detergent made with phosphates, a measure aimed at reducing water pollution. The ban will be expanded statewide in July 2010, the same time similar laws take effect in several other states.
The predicted public reaction:
At what point do the people tell the politicians to go to hell? At what point do they get off the couch, march down to their state legislator’s house, pull him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp [. . .]?
Were I in Washington State, I’d be cleaning my gun right about now waiting to protect my property from the coming riots or the government apparatchiks coming to enforce nonsensical legislation.
Yglesias makes a good comment:
But recall that it used to be considered beyond-the-pale for liberal bloggers to sometimes use naughty words. You see, though, that the minute conservatives lose power they go back to 1990s-style incitements to violence.
Full Post

31 March 2009

Wow. A little late, don't you think?

The notion that Bush's torture program was pure evil and counterproductive is finally mainstream. About freaking time.

The Washington Post: Detainee's Harsh Treatment Foiled No Plots
[N]ot a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida -- chiefly names of al-Qaeda members and associates -- was obtained before waterboarding was introduced, they said.
[. . .]

President George W. Bush had publicly described him as "al-Qaeda's chief of operations," and other top officials called him a "trusted associate" of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and a major figure in the planning of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. None of that was accurate, the new evidence showed.
ad_icon

Abu Zubaida was not even an official member of al-Qaeda, [. . .] and he ended up working directly with al-Qaeda only after Sept. 11 -- and that was because the United States stood ready to invade Afghanistan.

[. . .]

Others in the U.S. government, including CIA officials, fear the consequences of taking a man into court who was waterboarded on largely false assumptions, because of the prospect of interrogation methods being revealed in detail and because of the chance of an acquittal that might set a legal precedent.

[. . .]

"He was the above-ground support," said one former Justice Department official closely involved in the early investigation of Abu Zubaida. "He was the guy keeping the safe house, and that's not someone who gets to know the details of the plans. To make him the mastermind of anything is ridiculous."

As weeks passed after the capture without significant new confessions, the Bush White House and some at the CIA became convinced that tougher measures had to be tried.

[. . .]

"They couldn't stand the idea that there wasn't anything new," the official said. "They'd say, 'You aren't working hard enough.' There was both a disbelief in what he was saying and also a desire for retribution -- a feeling that 'He's going to talk, and if he doesn't talk, we'll do whatever.' "

The application of techniques such as waterboarding [. . .] prompted a sudden torrent of names and facts. Abu Zubaida began unspooling the details of various al-Qaeda plots, including plans to unleash weapons of mass destruction.

ad_icon

Abu Zubaida's revelations triggered a series of alerts and sent hundreds of CIA and FBI investigators scurrying in pursuit of phantoms. The interrogations led directly to the arrest of Jose Padilla, the man Abu Zubaida identified as heading an effort to explode a radiological "dirty bomb" in an American city. Padilla was held in a naval brig for 3 1/2 years on the allegation but was never charged in any such plot.

[. . .]

"We spent millions of dollars chasing false alarms," one former intelligence official said.

Despite the poor results, Bush White House officials and CIA leaders continued to insist that the harsh measures [. . .] produced useful intelligence that disrupted terrorist plots and saved American lives.

Some commentary: Bush's Torture Rationale Debunked

Hat Tip: Brad DeLong
Full Post

Krugman: America the Tarnished

here
Full Post

Why can't we visualize more than 3 Dimensions?

The article is here. The links inside the article are interesting too. Check them out if you have time.
Full Post

Glenn Beck is Criminally Insane and an Opportunist, Part III

Excerpt from the article:
He says that America is “on the road to socialism” and that “God and religion are under attack in the U.S.” He recently wondered aloud whether FEMA was setting up concentration camps, calling it a rumor that he was unable to debunk.

“I’m a rodeo clown,” he said in an interview, adding with a coy smile, “It takes great skill.” And like a rodeo clown, Mr. Beck incites critics to attack by dancing in front of them.
. . .
He added later: “I say on the air all time, ‘if you take what I say as gospel, you’re an idiot.’ ”
You can say that, but the problem is that people do. Why say it then?
Full Post

23 March 2009

Obama on Jay Leno

It is a great idea to talk directly to the people on late night television, since that's where most people get their political news anyway. Go Obama PR team. The interview is really good too, so you should watch it.

Full Post

21 March 2009

Disgusting

Washington Post: Israeli Soldier Says Military Rabbis Framed Gaza Mission as Religious
Full Post

Obama is No Socialist

Duh.

WSJ
Full Post

War Crimes in Gaza

The Guardian: Gaza war crime claims gather pace as more troops speak out
This is pretty messed up. Some excerpts:
"Shoot and don't worry about the consequences" was the message from commanders, said Marmor. Describing the behaviour of a lieutenant-colonel who briefed the troops, Marmor added: "His whole demeanour was extremely gung-ho. This is very, very different from my usual experience. I have been doing reserve duty for 12 years, and it was always an issue how to avoid causing civilian injuries. He said that in this operation, we are not taking any chances. Morality aside, we have to do our job. We will cry about it later."
And
An investigation by reporter Uri Blau, published on Friday in Haaretz, disclosed how Israeli soldiers were ordering T-shirts to mark the end of operations, featuring grotesque images including dead babies, mothers weeping by their children's graves, a gun aimed at a child and bombed-out mosques.

Another T-shirt designed for infantry snipers bears the inscription "Better use Durex" next to a picture of a dead Palestinian baby, with his weeping mother and a teddy bear beside him. A shirt designed for the Givati Brigade's Shaked battalion depicts a pregnant Palestinian woman with a bull's-eye superimposed on her belly, with the slogan, in English, "1 shot, 2 kills".

Full Post

20 March 2009

DeLong for Wall Street Compensation Reform and Foreign Affairs on Japan's Lost Decade

DeLong:
[P]unitive taxes on excessive immediate cash payouts paid by TARP and other government financial commitments are, I believe, completely appropriate. But thou shalt not bind the mouths of the kine that tread the corn: traders and financial executives who are willing to work very hard for what are now government-owned enterprises should be offered the carrot of long-term restricted equity stakes: that if they do their jobs well and if the government makes a healthy return because of their skill, forethought, and diligence, they should make healthy returns as well.

Punitive taxes on compensation that takes the form of long-term restricted equity stakes is a dangerous and destructive move. If the compensation bill that emerges from the conference committee does not allow TARP-receiving companies to offer such SVCSs, then Obama should veto it.

And if the traders of Wall Street then quit en masse? If they say that they are going to "Go Galt" if they don't get their traders' options to take the money upfront after assuring us shareholders that they have made us a lot of money, that their positions and strategies are sound, and that they have prudently managed the risks? Well, then that tells us something about what they really think the true value of their work product has been.

And Foreign Affairs (subscription required I believe, but any library should have access).
Full Post

18 March 2009

Cool debate at The Economist and Glen Beck is Criminally Insane, Part II

There's a coolish debate at The Economist about the relevance of Keynesian principles to the economic crisis with Brad DeLong taking the Affirmative. I've never heard of the other guy, but informed people shouldn't care about my opinions nor should they take my knowledge or not knowledge of something as any kind of an indicator of its importance.

Also, further evidence by way of Soelberg that Glen Beck is a nut job.
Full Post

07 March 2009

This is pretty messed up . . .

By way of Andrew Sullivan:

A nine-year-old girl is sexually abused by her stepfather over three years and then raped. She becomes pregnant with twins and a doctor performs an abortion:

“If the pregnancy had continued, the damage would have been worse, being a high risk pregnancy. The risk would have been of death or at the very least that she would never have been able to become pregnant again.”

The Catholic authorities immediately threaten to charge the girl's mother with homicide and excommunicate her. In fact, the archbishop declares her automatically excommunicated.

Full Post

The Economist endorses legalizing drugs.

Wow.
Full Post

02 March 2009

Is Microsoft cool again?

NY Times: Microsoft Maps Course to a Jetsons-like Future

<a href="http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-GB&playlist=videoByUuids:uuids:a517b260-bb6b-48b9-87ac-8e2743a28ec5&showPlaylist=true&from=shared" target="_new" title="Future Vision Montage">Video: Future Vision Montage</a>

more
Full Post

Bwa hahahhahaha . . . excellent

What the GOP Really Wants: Obama's Autograph
Full Post

22 February 2009

Glenn Beck is criminally insane

Wow. Any good will I may have had for Glenn Beck as a fellow Latter-day Saint just ended abruptly. I realize that Fox has to pander to the Sarah Palin people to stay financially viable post Bush administration, but good night. I can't think of anything more irresponsible than to encourage this kind of lunacy during a crisis. There are people who believe this crap.

Shortly after the election, I went with a friend to a sporting goods store to get a holster for his handgun (a right which I respect even though I choose not to exercise it for practical reasons – BYU doesn't allow it and my life is already accident prone without lethal force to back that up).

Anyway, while he was picking one out, I made small talk with the guy at the gun counter. He told me that they couldn't keep ammo and barrels of black powder in stock because people are hoarding it in case they have to rebel against the Obama administration's imagined anti-gun policies (he didn't say it that bluntly, but that was the idea).

Watch the video for yourself. These supposedly serious individuals seem to relish the idea of a militia movement rebelling against the Federal Government. The Republican Party needs to reform and it needs to do it quickly – this country needs responsible conservatives (ie actual conservatives, not rabid rural white Nationalists and the media who pander to them). The sooner these people can be made politically irrelevant the better.



Update: If this doesn't remove any doubt that serving in the military doesn't mean you deserve to be taken seriously regarding national security affairs, I don't know what will.
Full Post

21 February 2009

The Times on Iran

Iran: The friendliest people in the world
Full Post

Am I a bad person for thinking that stable relations with China are more important than "Free Tibet" activists' priorities?

Activists 'shocked' at Clinton stance on China rights
also: Economic woes trump rights as Clinton visits China
Full Post

Greenspan backs bank nationalization

Here's the article in the Financial Times

You gotta give Alan Greenspan credit (besides being very smart). He sure has no problem admitting he's wrong and adjusting to the new situation. There aren't many people in his position (or anywhere) who would do the same.
Full Post

12 February 2009

New Scientist: Studies suggest religious belief is innate

Very interesting article. We Mormons would call this phenomenon "the light of Christ." I wonder why the scientists who do these studies never consider the possibility that God actually existing may have something to do with such an innate belief.
Full Post

Happy Birthday Darwin (and Lincoln)

I already posted on Lincoln a few days ago, so he has not been ignored.


[darwin_charles.jpg]

Times and Seasons (blog): Mormons and Evolution
Mormon Times: BYU celebrates Darwin with week of lectures
The Economist: Belief In Evolution
The Onion: Evolutionists Flock To Darwin-Shaped Wall Stain

Update: To Soelberg too!
Full Post

10 February 2009

The Prescription Drug and Medical Devices Industries are Pure Evil

Wall Street Journal: Drug Makers Fight Stimulus Provision
WASHINGTON -- The drug and medical-device industries are mobilizing to gut a provision in the stimulus bill that would spend $1.1 billion on research comparing medical treatments, portraying it as the first step to government rationing…
The House version of the stimulus package sent shudders through the drug and medical-device industry. In a staff report describing the bill, the House said treatments found to be less effective and in some cases more expensive "will no longer be prescribed."…
Mr. Obama supported research into comparative effectiveness during his campaign. Administration officials and leading Democrats in Congress say the idea will help government programs direct their dollars to treatments that are worth the money…

Companies "want to control the data, how it is reviewed, evaluated, and whether the public and government find out about it and use it," said Harry Selker, a Tufts University professor who directs its clinical-research program.

That also worries Jerry Avorn of Harvard Medical School, a frequent drug-industry critic. Comparative research "has the potential to tell us which drugs and treatments are safe, and which ones work," he said. "This is not information that the private sector will generate on its own, or that the industry wants to share."

Michael Cannon of the libertarian Cato Institute said comparative effectiveness research "isn't going to do any good because the industry will defund it as soon as it presents a threat."

When the government's Agency for Health Research Quality suggested in 1995 that there were too many unnecessary back surgeries, doctors and industry groups attacked the conclusion. Mr. Cannon noted that Congress at the time slashed the agency's budget and stripped its authority to make medicare-payment recommendations.

Full Post

Abraham Lincoln in The Economist archives

here
Full Post

08 February 2009

04 February 2009

A form of my Abbott and Costello law proposed in Colorado

Denver Post: Bill would ease benefit-sharing.

Ok, so they didn't get the idea from me (and now that I look, I haven't posted about it eaither), but I did think of it too. I'd have to read the actual language in the bill to see how close it is, but this seems to be the gist. In particular, I'd like to see how "couple" is defined. I wouldn't have used that word. I like "companionship"or "partnership" or something that doesn't imply any kind of sexual activity. Anyway, it'll be interesting to see what happens.

Hat Tip: Andrew Sullivan
Full Post

03 February 2009

Thank goodness BYU protects me from this . . .

The 5 most popular YouTube Pages

Quote: "If I had to guess, I'd say the average YouTube user was a 14 year old girl with Down's syndrome."
Full Post

25 January 2009

Keep track of Obama's campaign promises

Campaign promises should always be taken with a grain of salt. They can be a good indicator of someone's priorities, but it is inevitable for various reasons that some things don't happen. Just the same, here's an interesting website that keeps track of Obama's campaign promises and their fulfillment status. So far, so good I think.
Full Post

Bill Gates is a good guy

Video
Full Post

23 January 2009

21 January 2009

Yay! I have high expected earnings . . .

Why Major in Economics?
Full Post

Elders Uchdorf and Ballard on the inauguration

LDS leaders feel 'deep emotion' at inauguration

I can't help but love how German the Uchtdorfs are (I don't really know how to explain it . . . or more like emotion in general).
At Tuesday's inauguration, the Uchtdorfs found themselves seated next to an African-American couple. "When the oath was taken, this lady next to her (Sister Uchtdorf) just embraced her and gave her a kiss with tears running down," said President Uchtdorf, adding that the emotions he sensed over the two days were not simply the result of the massive numbers witnessing nor the racially historic moment, but rather a sense of graciousness displayed by a free democracy.
Anyway, I recommend the article.
Full Post

Krugman the Buzz Killer

Shared Responsibility

Barack Obama, 2009:

What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility - a recognition, on the part of every American, that we have duties to ourselves, our nation, and the world, duties that we do not grudgingly accept but rather seize gladly, firm in the knowledge that there is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of our character, than giving our all to a difficult task.

George W. Bush, 2000:

A hundred years from now, this must not be remembered as an age rich in possessions and poor in ideals.

Instead, we must usher in an era of responsibility.

Bill Clinton, 1993:

We must do what America does best: offer more opportunity to all and demand responsibility from all.

It is time to break the bad habit of expecting something for nothing, from our government or from each other. Let us all take more responsibility, not only for ourselves and our families but for our communities and our country.


Also:
Give me some men who are half-hearted men . . .
The Vanishing muddle
Full Post

13 January 2009

Krugman on the government spending multiplier

Bang for the buck
Full Post

Small-Government Egalitarianism

Some good thoughts here from Edward Glaeser which appeal to me. I still think this is a good time to get good infrastructure projects built. Also, tax reductions, even payroll tax reductions, don't do much to help the unemployed. I'd like to see an expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit to help those between "good" jobs, expanded retraining and education spending to help reconfigure displaced workers for useful work, and health care reform to bring down costs and make basic coverage more available (a way to create larger insurance pools, such as Obama's proposal to allow people to buy into a government plan, allowing the government to use its power to bargain with drug companies, and to not spend so much on the expensive and often futile treatments for the ailments of the elderly are good places to start).
Full Post

12 January 2009

Stimulus: tax cuts or government spending?

These posts from Mark Thoma and the articles they link to are probably the best easily-read summary of the current debate from the Keynesians (Krugman, DeLong, Thoma, and others), and the self-hating Republican Keynesians (Greg Mankiw). I don't see myself as ignorant on the subject, but I also don't pretend to know enough to make any kind of really good judgement call. Nevertheless, I tend toward the government spending side of the debate (oh, like you've never agreed with something you didn't 100% understand because of your personal ideological tendencies).

I do understand Mankiw's point that spending should meet a cost/benefit analysis. Our national infrustructure could use some work . . . smart electric grid and bullet train system anyone? How about health care reform?
Full Post

28 December 2008

Raise the gas tax

Thomas Friedman
Bob Inglis and Arthur Laffer
Full Post

Megan McArdle: The finanical sector is not the automobile industry

Invidious Comparisons, part II

There are some really good points here. Among them:

[F]inancial executives have been fired in large numbers and taking pay cuts that reduced their income to a fraction of what was expected six months ago. Auto workers have not. Financial firms are in the process of laying off hundreds of thousands of their best paid workers (50,000 at Citibank alone); auto firms are not. …
[V]arious investment banking groups that specialized in equity and corporate bonds and wouldn't have known a CDO if it bit them on the ass; corporate and muni bond traders; cap markets guys, and so forth. All their markets dried up because of a credit crisis that they cannot even arguably be credited with creating. It's no more fair that they have to sell their house … and try to figure out what the hell they're qualified for, than that autoworkers have to. Less, maybe, because the autoworkers have had a lot of warning that their companies are on shaky ground … Apparently the message we want to send is "Don't go look for a high-paying job; get a picturesque one." …
No one in the financial industry declared that their salaries and perks weren't on the table until some vague and unspecified date in the future, as the UAW has. Actually, from what I understand, the CEO of Lehman tried to, and he was rightly told to go piss up a rope. …
The financial industry was bloated, the salaries out-of-whack with any possible real economic value they could be argued to have provided to anyone, and that will have to change--but we don't need the government to ensure that, because the industry is contracting rapidly, and the worst-hit parts are exactly the places that were most out of line with economic reality. …

And I think that most of the people who Hilzoy thinks of as picking on the auto workers would be willing to accept a deal in which the Big Three got some funds in order to put its balance sheet back together, then started firing people at will until they were small enough to make a profit again.

I've thought a lot about things like this, especially the loss of low-skill, relatively high paying jobs. On the one hand, I like the kind of social order where someone can go get a goodish job right out of high school and raise a family on that (even though I really don't understand those kinds of people at all . . . I was never raised with the idea that not going to college was even an option, let alone a good idea). There's a kind of inherent equality in such a society; even the little guy without great educational opportunities can live comfortably and securely in his place (I don't mean that as snobbily as it sounds. My future social standing is not in any way set in stone.).

On the other hand, I don't see any moral imperative to expend resources to preserve such industries that are not self-sustaining, and certainly not those that have wastefully burned through resources at the rate the American auto industry has. The basic arguments for free markets in most cases are convincing; if someone can manufacture cars more cheaply (Japanese firms), they should. If a for-profit enterprise is unprofitable, it should not exist (and it would be horribly inefficient to turn the auto industry into an insiders-only welfare program).

As for the autoworkers themselves, I have no problem with them being generously helped directly through programs to help them move, obtain training, keep health care benefits, and so forth. But if your specific employment does not add value at the margins, you should be fired and get different employment.

It really isn't very complicated.
Full Post

17 December 2008

Bickering among academics

Mankiw and Krugman at it again (unless I completely misunderstand the tone of the exchange).
Full Post

16 December 2008

Recipient of BYU honorary doctorate admits to war crimes on TV . . .

ABC News

Commentary:
The Daily Dish, also here
The Raw Story
Ross Douthat takes a less outraged stance that I can sympathize with. He still accepts the basic facts (since they are basically indisputable).
Full Post

15 December 2008

If the world were just, would senior Bush people be charged as war criminals?

The Washington Post: Pack of Liars

Yesterday's bipartisan Senate report on the abuse of detainees in U.S. custody at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and elsewhere doesn't just lay out a clear line of responsibility starting with President Bush, it also exposes the administration's repeated explanation for what happened as a pack of lies.

"The abuse of detainees in U.S. custody cannot simply be attributed to the actions of 'a few bad apples' acting on their own," the report finds. "The fact is that senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees. . .
The actual senate report is also worth reading (only 20ish pages).
Full Post

12 December 2008

Joe Stiglitz: No Bailout for Auto Industry

FT.com: Chapter 11 is the right road for US carmakers

So it's basically unanimous among people who know what they are talking about and who don't have a vested interest in the US auto industry. Businesses that don't produce items that people want to buy or trust for quality should not be rewarded with taxpayer money.
Full Post

09 December 2008

Wow, sucks to be Laos . . .

Forty years on, Laos reaps bitter harvest of the secret war

How about $15 billion to bailout Laos since . . . you know . . . this problem is all our fault?
Full Post

03 December 2008

Santa's Gmail inbox

Kinda funny in a "don't get mad at me if you are offended by this" sort of way. Here

Update locally hosted (other link is dead)
Full Post

Weird shiz in Thailand.

So I don't know if you've been paying attention, but the middle classes in Thailand are revolting because they don't want the peasants to vote, and they've actually overthrown a couple popularly elected governments in the last several years if I'm not mistaken. This is not supposed to happen. Before I blab on too much, here's the article that prompted this post.

By most narratives, the road to democracy from feudalism begins with economic liberalization, which fosters a powerful bourgeoisie that eventually overthrows the aristocracy/nobility (violently in America's case, or gradually in places like Great Britain). Think about the movie Amazing Grace when Wilberforce plays poker with an aristocratic fellow member of the House of Commons. The Noble raises the stakes and someone reminds him, "Your Grace, you know these merchant boys are richer than we are."

This narrative isn't playing out in Thailand. The bourgeoisie is now rioting in favor of anti-democratic reforms to the government. Looks like the mainstream narrative is wrong, or at least misinterpreted.

I tend to think it's partially wrong at least. The United States Constitution, for example, is not nearly as democratic as people think. Last summer, my personal project was to read James Madison's notes of the Federal Convention. And really, the vast majority of the founding fathers were not democrats (small "d"). Except with James Wilson and maybe a couple of others, a general distrust of the common people prevailed.

The United States Senate was put originally in the hands of the state legislatures for that reason (and there were even proposals to have them specifically elected by the economic elites). And in all the debates about "minority rights" they aren't talking about black people (obviously) or religious minorities for the most part. They're talking about rich people – they were afraid the people would try to confiscate their wealth.

It's possible that Thailand moved too quickly to a modern-style popularly elected government and now the middle class is up in arms, just as they may have been here had such reforms been put in place in the very beginning before loyalty to our constitutional government became a cultural and (almost?) religious necessity for anyone who wants to be accepted in polite company. Could a similar thing happen in China (which would shake most of the reason American foreign policy justifies such close economic and diplomatic ties with a communist country). Should we care? Is there any reason to think a free market (which is mostly where we get our benefit from other people's democracies I think) can't function in a partially non democratic regime? Anyway, it's interesting to think about.
Full Post

01 December 2008

This is pretty messed up . . .

Yes, it's the end of the semester and I don't feel like thinking about anything remotely serious.
Here's the link.

Update: here too.
Full Post

Most enjoyable time of avoiding my homework I've had in a while

http://basicinstructions.net
Full Post